Donald Trump’s NIH Pick Just Launched a Controversial Scientific Journal

President Donald Trump’s pick for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Scott Atlas, has recently stirred up controversy by launching a new scientific journal that has raised eyebrows in the scientific community.

The journal, titled “Science for Patriots,” has been criticized for its apparent focus on promoting research that aligns with conservative political views rather than adhering to traditional scientific principles.

Many scientists have expressed concerns that the journal may push a biased agenda and undermine the credibility of scientific research.

Dr. Atlas, a neuroradiologist and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, has defended the journal, stating that it aims to provide a platform for scientists who feel marginalized in the current scientific community.

The launch of “Science for Patriots” comes at a time when the NIH is already facing scrutiny over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, with critics accusing the agency of politicizing science.

Some have raised questions about whether Dr. Atlas’s involvement with the journal could further politicize the NIH and erode public trust in the agency’s research.

It remains to be seen how the scientific community will respond to the launch of “Science for Patriots” and whether it will have any lasting impact on the field of scientific research.

Overall, the launch of this controversial journal raises important questions about the intersection of politics and science, and the potential implications for the credibility and integrity of scientific research.

It is crucial for scientists and policymakers alike to uphold the principles of evidence-based research and scientific integrity in order to maintain public trust and promote the advancement of knowledge.